Driving Behaviour Change to Triple Retention

I led the design and delivery of a telematics product that shifted insurance from pricing risk to actively reducing it, helping newly qualified drivers become safer and more affordable to insure.

Impact

  • Retention increased from 2.0 to 6.3 months

  • Premium Generated £6,000,000+

  • Increased average LTV for young drivers by £740

  • This is now the core strategic product for growth

Problem

Newly qualified drivers are high-risk and expensive to insure, which leads to poor retention.

Internally, there was no clear alignment on how to solve this:

  • Commercial teams focused on pricing risk, not reducing it

  • Engineering were delivery-focused with little exposure to customers

  • Previous telematics products had low trust and engagement

  • There was scepticism around whether behaviour could meaningfully influence pricing without increasing risk.

The opportunity was not better tracking, but enabling behaviour change.

My role

I led this initiative end-to-end, acting as the bridge between product, design, and engineering.

  • Defined the proposition from fragmented customer and business insights

  • Secured buy-in to shift from risk pricing to behaviour change

  • Led research with 50+ interviews and a 4-month longitudinal study

  • Designed the end-to-end experience

  • PM’d delivery, aligning scope, priorities, and iteration

  • Transformed the squad into a more customer-focused, insight-driven team

Alignment & Key Decisions

To align teams around a new approach, I used customer research to reframe the problem from pricing risk to reducing it.

A key challenge was linking behaviour to pricing without introducing technical and commercial risk.

  • We explored real-time pricing feedback, but this proved complex and high-risk

  • I worked with engineering and commercial teams to evaluate trade-offs

  • We made the call to introduce 3-month pricing reviews, balancing feasibility with meaningful user feedback

This created a clear and achievable link between behaviour and reward while keeping delivery realistic.

Testing & Iteration

We prioritised testing early and often to ensure we were improving real outcomes, not just refining the interface.

  • Ran rapid prototype testing to validate key flows and reduce friction

  • Brought 15 young drivers to Cardiff for an in-person workshop, testing the journey end-to-end in a single day, this allowed enabled us to design with the target customer

  • Iterated live with users, refining questions, messaging, and flow in real time

  • Used tools like Maze and targeted one-question Typeform surveys to measure comprehension of key UI elements

This approach allowed us to quickly identify what worked, remove what didn’t, and build confidence in the direction before scaling.

The Product

We reframed the product as a driver coaching experience:

  • Transparency: Clear breakdown of scores and trip performance

  • Incentives: Behaviour-linked pricing with tiered discounts every 3 months

  • Education: Personalised, actionable feedback to improve driving

This created a direct and visible link between behaviour and real financial outcomes.

Culture Shift

The squad initially operated in silos, with engineering focused on delivery rather than customer outcomes.

I introduced a more integrated, customer-led way of working:

  • Brought engineers into user interviews and trained them to run their own

  • Established bi-weekly sessions to share customer insights

  • Involved engineering directly in ideation and problem-solving

Shift in behaviour:

  • From “What are we building?” to “What problem are we solving?”

  • From passive delivery to active ownership of the solution

  • Engineers began bringing customer insights into discussions, increasing both product quality and team ownership.

Reflection

The biggest shift was not just the product, it was how the team worked.

By embedding customer understanding into engineering and aligning teams around behaviour change, we moved from shipping features to solving the right problem.

That alignment, not just the design, was what ultimately drove the outcome.